![]() Now I am happy to say that I feel like the tool is much more consistent and the converted DNG files look better across the board. Originally, there were some images where I felt like the DNG was clearly the better file, but others where the difference between the two seemed much less apparent. In addition to that, I have found that I like the converted DNG files much more now than I had originally when compared to Adobe RAF conversions. I am happy to report that this issue is now completely solved for me with the updates that they have made, meaning I can convert my RAF files to DNG and still browse the web or watch YouTube, or whatever. Now if you recall, one of the biggest issues that I had with Iridient X-Transformer in my initial post was that the software utilized too much of my CPU during the conversion process and it would make using my computer for other things during that process slow and cumbersome. There have been many improvements and it’s honestly to the point now that I use it for virtually all of my paid work (and even some of my other imagery). The tool is currently in Beta, but since my initial post there have been several updates and the software is now in ‘Beta 3’. The reason this is helpful is because it side steps the Adobe RAF conversion process in Lightroom and gives you a better RAF rendering that what Adobe currently gives you. Iridient X-Transformer, for those who missed my initial post, is a tool from Iridient that uses their well known RAF conversion process to convert your Fujifilm RAW files into Adobe DNG files. It reminded me that I have yet to really do a followup to my Iridient Transformer post from back when the tool was first released, so I am here today with an update on this tool for those who prefer to stick with Lightroom. For the new DNG, with the all the settings above at base ISO, I use.A lot has been said about Capture One’s latest update and the improvements that it has brought to Fujifilm X series photographers who have decided to jump ship from Lightroom to Capture One. You will just have to add different sharpening and NR settings (significantly different than with LR alone). will be automatically be applied to the new DNG (no copying and pasting). The DNG might initially look a bit soft and noisy as it will always require some minimal NR and sharpening.Īll your initial Lightroom editing. ![]() I have "Turn off Lightroom/ACR sharpening" checked here because I will want to use different settings with the DNG than I used with the RAF in LR alone - I use a preset. Spaz, if you have your Lightroom Preferences set to automatically include changes to XMP (Edit Tab > Catalog Settings > Metadata). I used to just convert everything regardless but now just keep the Rafs and use Xtransformer Lightroom plugin when I have keepers and just copy paste all develop settings. At such extremes, IXT produces no significant image improvement anyway. The only time I don't use it is in cases of extreme ISO with significant shadow recovery applied, as the IXT DNGs can tend to skew purple. With optimal settings, I find X-Transformer to always make a significant improvement over Adobe's demosaicing. I've always just converted the "keepers" after some initial pre-processing and cropping, it only adds a couple of mouse clicks to the workflow and you don't wind up with lots of unnecessary large DNG files. I think that's what most people are doing when they convert from within Lightroom. X-Transformer uses XMP sidecars to propagate all changes from the original to the new DNG file. If you, like me, do not use sidecars all the time, you can generate XMP sidecars on demand (Save Metadata to File). I can make various adjustments in LR, and if I am still not happy with the result, only then can I run X-Transformer and still preserve all changes done so far. After reading Rico Pfirstinger's book and articles on Fuji Love, I realized that I could postpone invoking X-Transformer until deciding that I need it. IMO, many X-Trans images can be demosaiced with LR alone and do not need X-Transformer.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |